Carole Monnet vs Aneta Kucmova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Is there a difference in second serve point wins? Carole Monnet has achieved 36.61% of second serve points, slightly behind Aneta Kucmova, who stands at 37.65%.
• How do return stats compare? In recent months, Carole Monnet has won 52.07% on her opponent’s second serve returns, whereas Aneta Kucmova has a higher rate at 56.14%.
• Regarding first serve returns, Monnet reaches 35.67% compared to Kucmova’s more impressive 38.20%.
• Under pressure, Carole Monnet excels at saving breaks, with a rate of 48.21%, outperforming Aneta Kucmova, who has a lower rate at 42.43%.
• Who has had more success over the past year? Carole Monnet has a win rate of 56.90%, slightly surpassing Aneta Kucmova’s 54.72%.
• Surface performance varies: Monnet excels on Hard courts with a 63% win rate, while Kucmova matches her best performance on Clay, also with 63%.
• Both players appear consistent on the ITF circuit, with Monnet winning 54.90% of matches and Kucmova closely trailing at 54.72%.
• Monnet faces tougher competition, with opponents having an average rank of 280.38, compared to Kucmova’s 353.4 average opponent rank.
• In deciding sets, Aneta Kucmova shows dominance, winning 63% compared to Monnet's 47% success rate, which can influence live match predictions.

Editorial Prediction (October 5, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the head-to-head statistics, several factors emerge that may influence the outcome of this match between Carole Monnet and Aneta Kucmova. Kucmova's slight edge in second serve point wins could play a crucial role in pivotal moments during the game.

Return game capabilities also give Kucmova an advantage. Her recent performance in point returns is superior for both first and second serves. This positions her well to put Monnet under pressure at key intervals.

However, Monnet's ability to save break points suggests resilience, an asset that can certainly be influential if the match tightens.

The surface preference may not significantly sway this match as neither player is at their optimal playing field, though Monnet might feel slightly more comfortable on Hard courts.

Tactically, Kucmova’s record in deciding sets demonstrates mental tenacity, suggesting a possible upper hand should the match tightly extend to the final stages.

Weighing these factors, Aneta Kucmova appears more likely to edge out the victory in this encounter, primarily due to her return game prowess and successful performance in deciding sets.